Minutes of Town Council Meeting
Barrington Town Council Monday September 14, 2026
Barrington Town Hall - Council Chamber
6:30pm
Attachments can be found: https://clerkshq.com/barrington-ri
Present: President Braxton Cloutiér, Councilwoman Jordan Jancosek, Councilman Kerri O’Neill, Councilwoman Liana Cassar
Also Present: Town Manager Phil Hervey, Assistant Solicitor Amy Goins, Finance Director Maryanne Crawford, Town Clerk Stephanie Bernardo
Department Heads: Director of Business and Finance Maryanne Crawford, Captain Kevin Igoe, Fire Chief Gerald Bessette, Director of Public Works Alan Corvi, Library Director Kristin Chin, Director of Planning, Building and Resilience Herb Durfee II, Recreation and Senior Services Director Jean Bellm, Human Resources Director Kathleen Taraian, and Tax Assessor Michelle DiMeo.
1. President Cloutiér called the meeting to order at 6:36pm.
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Land Acknowledgement:
Aquene (Peace) We recognize the unique and enduring relationship that exists between Indigenous Peoples and their traditional territories. We acknowledge that we are in the ancestral homeland of the Pokanoket Tribe within the original territory of the Pokanoket Nation. We commit to ongoing efforts to recognize, honor, reconcile and partner with the Pokanoket people whose ancestral lands and water we benefit from today. Aquene (Peace)”.
4. Discuss and Act on the Consent Agenda:
All items with an asterisk (*) are routine by the Town Council and will be enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion on these items unless a Council member or citizen so requests, and the request is for good cause in which event the item will be removed from the consent agenda and will be considered in its normal sequence on the agenda.
President Cloutiér stated the Consent Agenda consisted of items #5 - #15 and asked if anyone from the Council or public would like to remove any item for discussion.
• President Cloutiér requested to pull #6, Jennifer White of 53 Whipple Ave requested to pull # 13, Acknowledge Receipt of Boards and Commissions Minutes and Recommendations
• Councilwoman Jancosek requested to pull #11, Acknowledge Correspondence
Ø Motion by President Cloutier to accept the Consent Agenda Items, 5 through 15, excluding # 6 and #11
Second: Councilwoman Jancosek.
Vote: Motion passed 4-0
President Cloutiér explained that Jack Anderson didn’t resign but passed away and recognized and thanked him for his many years of efforts and service to the town.
Ø Motion: by President Cloutier to accept the Boards and Commissions resignations:
Second: Councilwoman Jancosek
Vote: Motion passed 4-0.
Councilwoman Jancosek requested an update on the no left turn by the Plant City egress with the Rhode Island State Traffic Commission.
Planning Director Herb Durfee provided an update that the traffic commission is willing to install the sign based on the attendance at their meeting. Durfee will act as a liaison between the traffic commission and property owners of the shopping plaza.
Ø Motion by President Cloutier to Acknowledge Correspondence from the Bay Team, BCWA monthly and Annual Reports and State of Rhode Island’s Traffic Commission Agenda Item Request from the Town of Barrington- “No Left Turn for Plant City egress” Recommendations.
Second: Councilwoman Jancosek
Vote: Motion passed 4-0.
5. *Receive Updates and Events (See Town Manager’s Memo):
· Tree Planting & Removal: August 1, 2025 -July 31, 2026– 44 trees removed / 70 trees planted
· Duck Race – Saturday, September 26 (Woods Pond)
· Arts Festival – Sunday, September 27 (Town Hall Campus)
· Barrington Christian Academy 5K & Fall Fest – Saturday, October 3
6. *Accept: Resignations:
• Cemetery Commission: Jack Anderson
• Juvenile Hearing Board: Jack Anderson
• Zoning Board of Review: Holden Wilson
7. *Approve: Reappointments to Boards and Commissions: (none)
• Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Committee:
o Linsly Boyer: reappointed as 1st Alternate, with a term expiration date of September 30, 2029.
o Maria Laura Gonzalez: reappointed as a full member, with a term expiration date of September 30, 2029.
o Jonathan Leviss: reappointed as a full member, with term expiration date of September 30, 2029
• Juvenile Hearing Board:
o Joan Warren: to be appointed as a full member, with a term expiration date of November 30, 2027.
8. *Accept Monthly Department Reports (July & August): Business and Finance, Fire, Human Resources, Library, Police/Animal Control, Department of Public Works, Planning/Building and Resiliency, Recreation, Senior Services, Tax Assessor and Town Clerk
9. *Approve: Abatement List
10. *Approve Surplus Property: (To declare the following items as surplus property and authorize the Town Manager, at his discretion, to dispose of this property (discard) if it is not practical to sell per Chapter 49 of the Town Ordinances):
• Fire Department: 2012 International, Model 623, Rescue Vehicle, Vin: 1HTMNAAM5CH597830
11. *Acknowledge Correspondence: BAY Team monthly report, BCWA monthly report, BCWA Annual Report, and State of Rhode Island’s State Traffic Commission Agenda Item Request from Town of Barrington- “No Left Turn” for Plant City egress.
12. *Acknowledge Receipt of Boards and Commissions Minutes and Recommendations
• Parks and Recreation Commission minutes (none)
• Bicycle-Pedestrian Advisory Committee minutes
13. *Accept the Minutes: Town Council meeting held on July 27, 2026.
14. *Authorize Town to Sign Access Agreement with BCWA for Veterans Park Trail Project.
15. *Approve Bike to Beach, Inc: Saturday, September 19, 2026; 10:30am, 100-mile charity bike ride from Boston to Rhode Island. Applicant: Carl Sylvester, Operations Manager Bike to the Beach for Autism.
16. Discuss and Act: Interviews and Appointments:
• Bicycle-Pedestrian Advisory: (2 vacancies: 1st and 2nd alternates, term expiration of March 31, 2027)
o Interview: Sofia Graham and Gareth Connor
Ø No Motion: Candidates were not present
• Bristol County Water Authority: (1 vacancy: full member, term expiration date of February 28, 2029)
o Interview: Stephen Gross
Ø Motion: by Councilman O’Niell to appoint Stephen Gross to the Bristol County Water Authority Board of Directors as a Full Member, with a term expiring February 28, 2029.
Second: Councilwoman Cassar
Vote: Motion passed 4-0
• Board of Library Trustees: (1 vacancy: full member, term expiration date of December 31, 2027)
o Interview: David Clegg
Ø Motion: by Councilwoman Jancosek to appoint David Clegg to the Library Board of Trustees as a Full Member, with a term expiring December 31, 2027.
Second: Councilwoman Cassar
Vote: Motion passed 4-0
• Cemetery Commission: (1 vacancy: full member, term expiration date of November 30, 2027)
o Interview: John Fitta
Ø Motion: by Councilwoman Jancosek to appoint John Fitta to the Cemetery Commission as a Full Member, with a term expiring November 30, 2027.
Second: Councilman O’Neill
Vote: Motion passed 4-0
• Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Committee: (1 vacancy:2nd Alternate, term expiration date of March 31, 2029)
o Interview: Paige Rahn
Ø Motion: by Councilwoman Cassar to appoint Paige Rahn to the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Committee as a 2nd Alternate, with a term expiring March 31, 2029.
Second: Councilman O’Neill
Vote: Motion passed 4-0
17. Presentation: Sowams National Heritage Area Feasibility Study
Laura McNamara, Barrington resident and Vice Chair of Sowams Heritage Area along with Pokanoket Sachem Tracy Dancing Star, Barrington resident and Andrea Rounds, chairperson of the Sowams Heritage Area presented the council members with a bound copy of the Sowams National Heritage Area feasibility study. They requested that the town consider posting a digital version on the town’s website and the printed copy be available at the Barrington Public Library.
Ø Motion: No Motion
18. Discuss and Act: Resolution for Nockum Hill Historic Site
Town Manager’s Memo explained that Lot 3A on Assessor’s Plat 37 would be designated as the Nockum Hill Historic Site based on archaeological findings showing it was a seventeenth-century village site and the location of the first battle of King Philip’s War. This designation begins efforts to protect and manage the parcel, which borders the Doug Rayner Wildlife Refuge, including developing a management plan and establishing a conservation easement to prevent future development.
Stephen Venuti expressed gratitude to the Council for taking up the historic site designation and noted its strong connection to the ongoing Sowams Heritage work. Venuti emphasized that designation is just the first step, and will need additional conservation, recognition and educational efforts going forward.
President Cloutiér opened Public Comment
• Janine Wolf of 5 Atlantic Crossing: She expressed strong concerns about the proposed Nockum Hill historic site designation, stating that the historical findings were overstated and the supporting documents contained inaccuracies. Wolf noted it was stated that this designation could place new layers of external control over local land use and cultural narratives, potentially diminishing residents’ rights and asserted that the Town Council doesn’t have the authority to grant such oversight.
President Cloutiér closed Public Comment
Ø Motion: by Councilwoman Jancosek To approve the Resolution designating Lot 3A on Assessor’s Plat 37 as the Nockum Hill Historic Site, as presented.
Second: President Cloutiér
Vote: Motion passed 4-0
19. Discuss and Act: Town Council Liaison Appointments to Fill Councilor Berard’s Vacancy (BPAC, Board of Assessment Review)
Ø Motion: by President Cloutiér to appoint Councilor O’Neill as the temporary liaison for September, October and November to the Bicycle Pedestrian Advisory Committee and appoint Councilwoman Cassar as the temporary Liaison to the Board of Assessment Review for September, October and November meetings.
Second: Councilwoman Jancosek
Vote: Motion passed 4-0
20. Discuss and Act: Bids
• Police Department: (1) 2027 Chevrolet Blazer Police Pursuit Vehicle
The cost to purchase the vehicle and to purchase the aftermarket equipment (lighting, sirens, consoles, antennas, graphics, etc.) is based on State of Massachusetts Master Price Agreements. Funding source: the Police Auto Replacement Capital Reserve Account.
Ø Motion 1: by President Cloutiér To approve the purchase of a 2027 Chevrolet Blazer Police Pursuit Vehicle from Colonial Municipal Group of Plymouth, MA, at a cost of $47,664.
Second: Councilwoman Jancosek
Vote: Motion passed 4-0
Ø Motion 2: by President Cloutiér To approve the purchase of emergency equipment and vehicle upfitting from Island Tech Services of Warren, RI, at a cost of $11,778.90, as presented.
Second: Councilwoman Jancosek
Vote: Motion passed 4-0
21. Discuss and Act: Update on Barrington Bike/Ped Infrastructure Project Status
Town Manager Hervey reviewed the attached map showing recent bike and pedestrian improvements, work underway, and projects in design. He highlighted several completed sidewalk projects, the nearly finished Upland Way connection to the Landfill 3 trails, and the reopening of the State-replaced bike path bridges. He noted that the Foot Street path is under construction, with erosion repairs following recent heavy rain. Engineering is in progress for sidewalks on Federal Road, Bay Spring Avenue, and two Hampton Meadows projects, one on Massasoit Avenue and one on New Meadow Road with construction expected in early 2028. Additional projects, including the South Lake Drive bike path and improvements to the Veterans Park Broadview trail, are moving through engineering and permitting, with construction anticipated next spring. He concluded that substantial progress has been made in recent years, with more improvements planned.
President Cloutier inquired if the bike and pedestrian infrastructure project status maps and updates can be posted on the town’s website.
Councilman O’Neill expressed appreciation for how well the project is progressing and asked whether the South Lake Drive bike path would be included as part of this project or handled separately.
Councilwoman Cassar requested an update at one of the next two meetings on where the Barrington projects stand in the state plan so the Council can have a clearer understanding by the end of the year.
President Cloutiér opened Public Comment
• Tom Rhimoshytus of 1 Howard Ave: Tom noted that bike and pedestrian projects are progressing well but raised concerns about safety. He observed that some cyclists and scooter riders ignore stop signs, creating dangerous situations, and suggested increased police enforcement or collaboration with the pedestrian committee to address safety issues and improve compliance.
President Cloutiér closed Public Comment
Ø Motion: None
22. Discuss and Act: Styrofoam Collection (Resolution)
The Council reviewed a request from the Senior Services Advisory Board to explore responsible Styrofoam disposal but noted that no regional facilities currently accept Styrofoam for recycling. The Council expressed support for a resolution encouraging the state to improve Styrofoam recycling options, which Assistant Solicitor Amy Goins drafted.
Councilman O’Neill noted that, as written, the resolution might suggest the town supports the use of Styrofoam. He requested that it be amended to clarify that the town encourages the state to pursue regulations promoting recyclable packaging materials, such as paper, instead of Styrofoam.
Councilwoman Cassar stated she echoed Councilor’s O’Neill’s perspective and requested a reference that Barrington has a history of working on the reduction of single-use items.
Assistant Town Solicitor Amy Goins will work together with Councilman O’Neill on the amendments
President Cloutiér opened Public Comment
• Janine Wolf of 5 Atlantic Crossings: Wolf voiced strong support for the Styrofoam resolution and emphasized the need for a place to responsibly dispose of Styrofoam. She also urged the Council to push the state to address broader recycling issues, noting that many materials placed in recycling bins are not actually recycled due to a lack of facilities, and argued that improving statewide recycling capacity is essential for responsible waste management.
President Cloutiér closed Public Comment
Ø Motion: by President Cloutiér To approve the Resolution Urging the Rhode Island General Assembly and Rhode Island Resource Recovery Corporation to Examine and Improve Options for Styrofoam Recycling, as amended.
Second: Councilwoman Cassar
Vote: Motion passed 4-0
23. Discuss and Act: Police Department Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) for second School Resource Officer at Barrington Schools and Community Engagement Officer
The Town Managers memo explains that this item was discussed at the July 27 meeting, but no action was taken. As outlined in Chief Correia’s memo, the School Committee has approved an MOU establishing two SRO positions, one serving year-round with added security duties, and the other working only during the academic year. The Town is also creating a full-time community engagement officer, supported by a grant covering $41,000 annually for the next three years.
President Cloutiér welcomed School Committee Chair, TJ Peck and School Superintendent, Holly Hageman and asked them to speak on the status of the School Resource Officer
Thomas Peck explained the need for a second School Resource Officer (SRO), noting that school safety has not historically been prioritized and that the current SRO is overstretched, covering all six public schools and local private schools. A second SRO would allow one officer to serve full-time, including during summer months, and act as the designated point person for district safety in coordination with the Police Chief and Superintendent. He summarized the policy and MOU development process, noting multiple public readings and incorporation of community feedback. The updated MOU formalizes expectations, places strict limits on the SRO’s role as a resource rather than a law enforcement presence, and outlines required qualifications and extensive training. Peck acknowledged national concerns about SROs but expressed confidence that the detailed safeguards, along with Barrington’s community-policing approach, address these issues. Peck referenced a past incident in which the SRO played a critical role, underscoring the practical importance of the position. Peck thanked the Council and offered to review any specific portions of the MOU.
Holly Hageman stated she is a 40-year career educator ad school administrator and has experience working with SRO’s before, during and after Sandy Hook. Hageman noted that in every district she’s served, SRO’s have been a valuable resource, and they were supported by MOUs like this one, but less detailed than the one under consideration. She emphasized that SRO’s build strong relationships with students, staff and families and offer expertise in emergency management, safety plans and crisis response.
COUNCIL DISCUSSION:
Councilman O’Neill commended the new MOU for its strong student protections, training requirements, and accountability measures, and thanked the school committee, administration, and Chief Correa for their work. O’Neill noted a concern that the previous MOU required weekly reporting, but the new draft does not and asked why it was removed and stated he was in favor of the reporting. Asked Chair Peck to clarify two issues. One is the MOU itself, and the other is for a second SRO. O’Neill mentioned that work on the MOU began earlier, led by Dr. Megan Douglas and Chairman Peck, and was aimed at strengthening safeguards independent of later conversations about adding another SRO. O’Neill also asked about a reference to the district-wide safety assessment by the Edward Davis Company, which recommended a second SRO among many findings. He asked whether the assessment offered alternative approaches besides adding an SRO, such as hiring private security professionals or cybersecurity consultants.
Councilwoman Cassar questioned whether the district’s safety and security plan is fully developed and currently in use. Also asked if they have any data supporting the need for a second SRO member. Cassar noted that schools already have multiple layers of support staff that include teachers, administrators, social workers, psychologists, and guidance counselors. She emphasized that police involvement should be limited to situations involving criminal behavior. She expressed concern about the SRO model potentially blurring these boundaries and questioned why a police officer, rather than school staff or other qualified security professionals, is needed to implement and coordinate safety and security plans. She requested any existing data that justifies placing this responsibility with law enforcement.
Councilwoman Jancosek expressed concerns about several elements of the proposed MOU and the process leading to council consideration. She requested reinstating the weekly review requirement and adding a formal annual review before the Council. She also asked for clarification on the Police Department’s $25,000 contribution toward the first SRO, noting uncertainty about whether this was new or existing funding. Jancosek questioned why the SRO proposal had come before the Town Council without more joint discussion with the School Committee, especially since the Committee had reviewed the proposal over multiple meetings. She felt a joint meeting like prior collaboration on the school building project would have provided needed context for such a significant decision. Regarding the Community Engagement Officer, she noted language in the MOU indicating substantial school-based responsibilities and asked whether this effectively meant three officers rotating through the schools. She also raised concerns about overlapping between that role and the duties of the proposed second SRO, asking for clearer definitions of roles. Chief Correia clarified that the Community Engagement Officer would not primarily be stationed in schools but would serve flexibly, with some school-based engagement as needed. He distinguished that role from the SROs, noting its broader community-focused function. Jancosek inquired about any other school districts that have this model and the Chief mentioned the Glastonbury, Farmington, Westport, CT school districts where they have multiple SROs operated successfully, including in elementary schools.
President Cloutiér thanked his colleagues, Chief Correa, Superintendent Hageman, and Chair Peck for their input. He stated that while everyone supports school safety and respects the Police Department, he does not believe the record demonstrates that adding a second School Resource Officer (SRO) is the most effective use of resources at this time. Cloutiér emphasized that key information is lacking and that a comprehensive school safety plan should encompass administrators, mental health staff, training, and cybersecurity and not begin with adding an additional police officer. He expressed support for the MOU governing the current SRO and praised the work of Officers G. and Levi, acknowledging they are stretched thin. However, Cloutiér could not support adding a second SRO without clearer justification and data. He encourages increased investment in mental health and broader involvement of school staff in safety planning. Cloutiér concluded by thanking all parties for their collaboration and documentation, noting the importance of working together for Barrington’s residents.
President Cloutiér opened Public Comment
• Chris Santos youth organizer for the Alliance of Rhode Island Southeast Asians for Education (RISE): Stated that this can lead to the criminalization of students, especially students of color and students with disabilities; leads to more suspensions. Recommends more social workers and school counselors who provide emotional support, skill-building and academic help
• Joseph Ortiz youth organizer for RISE: Stated the presence of SROs can contribute to the criminalization of students, especially students of color. He feels schools should prioritize support-based staff such as social workers and guidance counselors because they have better skills to de-escalate conflict and foster a healthy learning environment
• Chloe Bryant junior at Barrington High School: Stated that the presence of an officer can carry a negative perception because law enforcement is something young people may be taught to be cautious about and because it’s known that SROs are armed and carry weapons and this can make students feel less safe and more intimidated. Stated that true safety isn’t measured by the number of officers in the hallways; it is measured by whether every student feels seen, supported and free from fear in their school.
• Bubbly youth organizer for RISE and 12th grade student at Pilgrim: Opposes adding more SROs in Barrington because evidence shows that policing in schools disproportionately harms students of color and students of disabilities. Argued that funding should support mental health resources, social workers, counselors and trained faculty, since most school violence stems from unmet behavioral and mental health needs.
• Nancy Zong former Providence Public School System Student and Program Manager RISE: Opposes School Resource Officers because of her experiences in Providence schools showed they were ineffective at de-escalation and often harmful. She emphasizes that SROs do not reduce school shootings and that armed officers in learning environments disproportionately impact black, brown, LGBTQ+, and disabled students. Instead, she argued that real school safety comes from expanding access to counselors, nurses, and mental-health professionals. Schools with strong support systems have better attendance, fewer suspensions, and higher graduation rates without needing police in their halls.
• Lyndsey Boyer of 7 High Street: As a Barrington parent with two children in the school system she opposes adding a second SRO, saying that police in schools often create distraction or anxiety for students who associate police presence with danger. After hearing new information during the meeting, she was also confused about the proposed SRO because their role seemed similar to that of a social worker and why not invest in more social workers.
• Paige Rahn of Barington Resident and Rhode Island Social Worker: Agrees with Council members that this is a joint effort with the Town Council and School Committee. Rahn sees SRO’s the positive and negative but mostly believes that the district’s social workers aren’t fully funded and they need to be in every school. Rahn believes social workers should be full-time employees and then possibly consider a SRO.
• Janine Wolf of 5 Atlantic Crossings: Wolf disagrees that the Barrington. School System should function as a mental health services provider because schools already have counselors and social workers and refer families to professional clinical care when needed. She feels that the appropriate setting for mental health treatment is in a professional clinical setting. She stated that police officers are a valuable community resources and if students believe police are a negative presence those perceptions are misguided and represent an educational opportunity to correct.
• Jennifer Wood Director at RI Center of Justice: Wood stated that she has been an education lawyer for over 40 years with other extensive experience with state educational departments. Her experience in public safety and emergency response planning raised concerns that the proposal before the Council is unclear and may combine police functions with emergency planning or student support roles in a single new position, creating significant role confusion. They noted that the district’s emergency planning needs are not appropriately met by SRO-level staffing, that the draft MOU contains ambiguous provisions regarding student questioning, and that the extensive training requirements seem mismatched to the responsibilities described. Wood urged more joint Council and School Committee discussions to refine the MOU and clarify expectations. She cited new Rhode Island Kids Count data showing Barrington among the least-resourced districts for school social workers, which emphasized the need to strengthen social-emotional support staff before adding any new law enforcement position. Wood stated that if there is only funding for one Full-Time Employee, it should be for a school social worker because they are best equipped to serve as trusted recipients of student disclosures.
• Stuart Taylor of 295 Washington Road: Mentioned how he went to Providence Schools and didn’t have any of these issues because of one thing that helped him and that is the fear of God. He stated that there needs to be prayer at school and more disciplinary practices. Taylor asserted that current challenges come from a decline in religious and moral guidance. Taylor ended by stating that spiritual guidance, not expanded programs, is the key to improving student behavior.
• Tom Rimoshytus of 1 Howard Ave: TR said he hears a lot of untruths and fiction. Mentioned his experience with public service and feels that many students prefer reporting concerns to public safety people like police and firefighters rather than social workers and teachers. He cited a recent incident in Cranston where a SRO successfully intervened to prevent a potential threat. He emphasized that officers are better equipped to deal with gangs and weapons. He also stressed the importance of active shooter training.
President Cloutiér closed public comment
President Cloutiér thanked everyone for their comments. Stated that he does think this can move forward but in a different manner but not as it is today.
Ø Motion: by President Cloutiér to approve the police department’s memorandum of understanding (MOU) for a second school resource officer at Barrington Schools and community engagement officer.
Second: Councilwoman Jancosek
Vote: motion failed 4-0
President Cloutiér called for a ten-minute break at 9:30pm
24. Discuss and Act: Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Committee Public Art Initiatives
Town Manager Hervey updated the Council on their May 4th motion to work with the DEI committee to develop a proposal with next steps to a community arts project. The Solicitor has no legal concerns about the initiative.
A consideration for crosswalk paint projects will be compliance with the Federal Highway Administration interpretation1 that colors are permissible provided they “are devoid of retroreflective properties and that they do not diminish the effectiveness of the legally required white transverse pavement markings used to establish the crosswalk.”
Crosswalk locations will be important as well. State roads will need to be avoided. Painting a crosswalk on a Town road could require a police detail, whereas painting crosswalks on Town properties (such at the Library/Town Hall campus) could be done without the cost of a detail (placing cones/barriers). Painting sections of walkways outside of vehicle travel lanes, such as those highlighted in the aerial below near the resilience garden, would have fewer logistical issues to work out compared to crosswalks. Hervey noted that project costs vary based on scope of work and recommended limiting efforts to one of two public art projects and suggested that painting supplies could be funded through the Council’s existing DEI training and community events budget of $4000.
COUNCIL DISCUSSION:
Council members expressed their support for the initiative and agreed that the Town Center would be an ideal location. Councilman O’Neill added that he would discourage using the pathways near the resilience garden, noting that placing two different projects in the same area could lessen the impact of both.
DEI COMMITTEE INPUT:
Committee members Jacob Brier and Linsly Boyer spoke about the initiative and noted that they do not need funding from the DEI Training and Community Budget, as they will be fundraising and have already secured community support. They agreed that the Town Center is an excellent suggested location and mentioned the possibility of benches at the beach or a mural and possible walkways at Police Cove Park. DEI Committee will have a booth at the upcoming They will continue working with the town to finalize potential locations, incorporate community input, and return with a final proposal for Council review.
President Cloutiér opened Public Comment
• Donna Moss of 19 Brookfield Avenue: Moss expressed two main concerns: that the proposed symbols on public property would represent government endorsement of beliefs not shared by all residents, and that the town should remain neutral on divisive issues to maintain public trust. She also questioned whether painted symbols truly create belonging and urged the Council to use viewpoint-neutral messages that reflect the shared values of the entire community.
• Dale Winters of 14 Middle Highway: Winters thanked the Council for the chance to comment and expressed concerns that painted crosswalks may unintentionally affect residents with disabilities because crosswalks rely on consistent high-contrast markings for safety. The use of multicolored designs could reduce visibility for people with low vision and for some autistic individuals and people with cognitive or intellectual disabilities. Winters believes safety must remain the paramount consideration and when evidence is conflicting is best to err on the side of protecting pedestrians and the public.
• Bonnie Wojcik of 9 Eleanor Drive: Wojcik expressed concern about the town’s plan to install rainbow crosswalks and painted benches as part of a public art initiative. Drawing on your decades of experience at RISD, she noted that while art can enrich a community, its appreciation is subjective, people usually have the choice to engage with art or not. When art is placed on essential public infrastructure like crosswalks, that choice disappears, potentially forcing individuals to compromise personal beliefs simply to use a safe route. Wojcik respectfully urged the council to reconsider using critical public safety features as sites for artistic expression.
• Lindsley Boyer of 7 High Street: Boyer mentioned that in caring communities such as Barrington, it is the responsibility of the town to intentionally include symbols of minority cultures. Boyer stated that the proposed art initiative isn’t meant to take anything away from anyone, but simply to acknowledge and respect neighbors who are already part of the community. The symbols serve as a visible affirmation that the town sees, values, and supports them.
• Dr. Sarah Alden 224 Wahington Road: Dr. Alden is a clinical psychologist and parent in strong support of rainbow crosswalks, noting that many of her neighborhood parents share this support. She said that rainbows are widely recognized symbols of positivity, joy, and safety across cultures, religions, science, and especially for young children. Parents believe bright colors would make crosswalks more visible and inviting, helping kids feel safe. She emphasized that Barrington is a child-centered community, and rainbow crosswalks would reflect a vibrant, welcoming environment. She expressed her disappointment that such a positive symbol has become a source of division and urged the town to strive for better for its families and children.
• Janine Wolf of 5 Atlantic Crossings: Wolf explained that while rainbows are generally beloved, they have taken on political meaning for many adults, which can make some residents feel excluded or uncomfortable. She emphasized that people with differing held beliefs also deserve consideration, and that public art tied to a specific social or political message may unintentionally “other” those individuals. She suggested that the DEI committee should aim for inclusivity in all directions and avoid installations that could make some community members feel unwelcome.
• Vanda Boguch of 17 Prospect Street: Boguch emphasized the importance of protecting children from premature exposure to sexual content, citing research showing significant negative mental-health and developmental impacts. She urged the council to keep public spaces neutral and child-focused, expressing concern that rainbow-themed installations could be interpreted as sexualized symbols by some and therefore inappropriate for environments meant to support healthy childhood development.
President Cloutiér closed public comment
ADDITIONAL COUNCIL DISCUSSION:
Councilman O’Neill explained that truly viewpoint-neutral government decisions do not exist, because every policy choice reflects a perspective, whether it’s funding priorities or national symbols like “In God We Trust.” He encouraged the council to recognize that all public decisions inherently express a viewpoint, and to keep this in mind when evaluating the discussion around public art and community symbolism.
Councilwoman Cassar explained that a truly neutral environment does not exist, noting that communities, including Barrington, already express dominant cultural messages, and that it is the responsibility of those in public service to ensure all residents feel safe and seen, especially those who currently face greater barriers. Cassar emphasized that LGBTQ+ youth often experience discrimination and fewer opportunities, and that small gestures like inclusive public art can signal that the community cares about and supports them.
Councilwoman Jancosek stated she supports the LGBTQ community and supports the initiative.
President Cloutiér stated that his decision to serve on the Town Council is rooted in wanting to be a voice for everybody and including those who don’t yet see themselves represented. As a member of the LGBTQIA2S+ community, he described how community support, inclusive events, and everyday acceptance have made Barrington feel welcoming for him and his husband, who did not always feel safe growing up here. Cloutiér emphasized that inclusive symbols like rainbow art are about visibility, beauty, and belonging, not politics or sexuality. He expressed strong support for the initiative, noting that it aligns with the values that drew him to public service and to make Barrington a community where all can thrive.
Ø Motion: by Councilwoman Cassar to direct the Town to work with the DEI Committee on the location, final design and logistics to complete up to two projects as part of the Committee’s public art initiative.
Second: Councilwoman Jancosek
Vote: Motion passed 4-0
25. Discuss and Act: Parks and Recreation Commission (PRC) Recommendations
Town Manager Hervey’s memo states that the Town has begun evaluating the Park and Recreation Commission’s request to install security cameras at Town fields, and to replace the security camera at the Legion Way Rink. Please see attached memos. The Town is looking into replacing the old security camera system at Legion Way, which is a very isolated site that also includes a major Town sewer pump station. The IT Department estimates the cost at around $2,000 to $2,500. The other sites, in Hervey’s opinion, require further study if there is interest in pursuing cameras at those sites.
Council members agreed to continue evaluating security cameras at town fields and investigate alternative security measures, including alarms, with attention to installation, operating and maintenance costs versus potential vandalism damages.
Ø Motion: by Councilman O’Neill to ask Town Manager to continue evaluating the Parks and Recreation Commission request to install security cameras at town fields and also look into other security measures such as security alarms, and to look into the cost-effectiveness of such systems against the cost of future vandalism and damage.
Second: Councilwoman Cassar
Vote: Motion passed 3-1: Ayes: Cloutiér. Cassar, and O’Neill; Nayes: Jancosek
26. Discuss and Act: Ordinances
INTRODUCTION(S)
• 2026-6 An Ordinance Amendment to Chapter 134- Parks and Recreation, Article I. General Regulations, § 134-14 Prohibition of certain motor vehicles and electric vehicles; § 134-15 Designated ways for certain motor and electric vehicles.
TM Comment: According to Assistant Solicitor Amy Goins:
The proposed ordinance is an amendment to an existing ordinance that prohibits motor bikes on public property. The amendment would explicitly add e-bikes and e-scooters to this prohibition. It applies wherever the Police Department is presently enforcing this ordinance as to motorcycles - that includes property like parks and parking lots, and it would also include sidewalks. Motorcycles can of course be operated on roadways if the operator is licensed and the motorcycle is properly registered, but people can't ride them on sidewalks and can't ride them around the baseball field. This would apply the same rule to e-scooters and e-bikes.
Ø Motion: by President Cloutiér to introduce Ordinance #2026-6, and to schedule the public hearing for the October 5, 2026, Council meeting.
Second: Councilwoman Jancosek
Vote: Motion passed 4-0
• 2026-7 An Ordinance Amendment to Chapter 45 Salaries and Compensation for non-union employees §45-21 Pay scale by occupational titles.
TM Comment: Chapter 45 Salaries and Compensation, §45-21 Pay Scale by Occupational Titles, needs to be updated. The amounts are adjusted upward to capture two to three years of potential salary increases.
Ø Motion: by President Cloutiér to introduce Ordinance #2026-7, and to schedule the public hearing for the October 5, 2026, Council meeting.
Second: Councilwoman Jancosek
Vote: Motion passed 4-0
• PUBLIC HEARINGS: (none)
27. General Public Comment (Maximum one statement per speaker of up to three minutes in length):
To the public: This agenda item is for members of the public to speak regarding a topic that is not already on the agenda. Please indicate that you would like to speak by raising your hand. When you are recognized, please state your name and residence for the record.
• Jim Hummel of 8 Heathwood Drive: Hummel expressed deep concern about several recent Town Council decisions, including what he described as a poorly executed trash collection rollout, the adoption of speed cameras without first increasing traditional enforcement, and the handling of the FTR process, which felt like it undermined voter intent. Hummel criticized the lack of due diligence in contracting, the shift toward surveillance-based enforcement, and the Town Manager’s response to resident-driven budget amendments, noting the town’s significant budget growth over the past decade. He also challenged the long-standing practice of council members declining to answer public questions during meetings, citing the Attorney General’s guidance that such dialogue is permissible in public comment. Hummel concluded by stating that when the council chooses not to respond, it is by choice, not because the law prevents it. Hummel submitted a written advisory opinion from the Rhode Island Attorney General during public comment for the Council’s consideration.
28. Set Agenda: For the next meeting of the Council: Monday, October 5, 2026, at 6:30pm, in Council Chamber
a) Update to Tree Ordinance
b) Draft 2026 Comprehensive Plan
c) Update on Kids Kove Playground
d) RI Residential Composting Program
e) New Dog Park Fence at Christine Conrad Lane Dog Park
f) Dog Waste Removal Stipend
29. Adjourn:
Ø Motion by President Cloutiér to adjourn the Town Council Meeting At 11:04pm.
Vote: Motion passed