The regular meeting of the South Kingstown School Committee was held on May 20, 2010 at the South Kingstown High School Cafeteria at 7:00 PM.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Kevin Jackson (Co-Chair), Maureen Cotter, Scott Mueller, Richard Angeli, Frederick Frostic, and Elizabeth Morris.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Anthony Mega.
ADMINISTRATORS PRESENT: Kristen Stringfellow, Superintendent; Mary Kelley, Assistant Superintendent; John Ritchotte, Director of Administrative Services; Judith Saccardo, Director of Pupil Personnel Services; Sheila Sullivan, Broad Rock Middle School Principal; Kathleen Egan, Curtis Corner Middle School Assistant Principal; Debra Zepp, Matunuck Elementary Principal; Michelle Little, Wakefield Elementary Principal; Pauline Lisi, Peace Dale Elementary Principal; Jennifer Enck, Peace Dale Assistant Principal; Nancy Nettik, West Kingston Elementary Principal; and Robert McCarthy, High School Principal.
Mr. Jackson called the May 20, 2010 School Committee Meeting to order at 7:15 PM.
· Oliver Lucier, Grade 8 will represent RI at National Geography Bee:
Dr. Stringfellow advised that she was delighted to honor Oliver Lucier, an 8th grader at
Curtis Corner Middle School who won the State Geography Bee at Rhode Island College on Friday, April 9, 2010. She noted that it is a wonderful accomplishment; and Oliver will represent Rhode Island at the national Geography Bee in Washington, DC on May 24-27. She advised that
Ms. Julie Previte, Social Studies Curriculum Coordinator from Curtis Corner Middle School will accompany Oliver to the event. School Committee members congratulated Oliver individually.
· Music delegation request to offer comment:
Mrs. Jen Collins read an article written by Liz Boardman of the South County
Independent. It was noted that the elementary orchestra is worth saving from the proposed budget cuts. She shared that on a given day, we have 227 students in grades 4-12 orchestra program. Chopping the ½ time elementary position will affect 115 elementary school orchestra students. Ms. Collins encouraged the Committee to learn from our history where we dwindled down to 14 musicians and enrollment plummeted; however, when elementary orchestra was reinstated 25 years ago we have been growing steadily. She shared that this year 43 musicians represented South Kingstown at the Junior- and Senior-level at All-State ensembles. She advised that a quality music education program is supported by three performance legs: orchestra, band, and chorus which allow all students a chance to reach their proficiency.
Mrs. Collins asked the Committee to listen to an excerpt from Beethoven’s Pastoral Symphony, which will be played by many South Kingstown alumni students as Beethoven wrote it. She then had the Committee listen to the same excerpt without the strings, noting that something was missing that left a lot of silence. Mrs. Collins stated that this is one of the consequences of cutting elementary strings from the elementary program. Mrs. Collins stated that there is no better way to learn about music than to make music. This process needs to begin at the elementary school, noting that it is inclusive and inviting for students. She advised that in April 2010, the Rhode Island Board of Regents Grade Span Expectations for the Arts require high school seniors to show proficiency in order to graduate. In order to graduate, if a student chose music as their Arts proficiency, they would have to sit down and play music that they have never seen before with minimal errors. In order to reach that level of accomplishment for a 12th grader, they must begin learning at the elementary level. If we do not start at the elementary level, we do not provide students with sufficient opportunity to learn.
Mrs. Collins advised that participation in instructional music has been proven to improve SAT and other test scores. She shared that there are 527 4th & 5th graders who elect to participate in music and chorus in South Kingstown; 570 6th, 7th, and 8th grade students elect to participate in music and chorus at Broad Rock and Curtis Corner Middle Schools; the music program provides a sense of belonging and community for students; 252 high school students view music as an important part of their education; and a total of 1,349 students participate in music grades 4-12 in South Kingstown. She encouraged the Committee to remember that each number represents a child or young adult who we are charged with fully educating. The cut in the elementary music program would have a negative impact on our entire music program; to cut elementary orchestra would have a negative impact on high school musicians who are trying to fulfill their new arts proficiency in order to graduate. Mrs. Collins concluded by stating that in South Kingstown music matters to us; it matters to students, parents, and community members.
Emily Collins, sophomore and active member of the music programs offered, stated that music has been a part of everything she does at home and school. She stated that it is a way to enhance her confidence. Ms. Collins stated that when sports aren’t your thing, music reminds her that she is good at something. She also advised that if she did not start learning at a young age, she would not be where she is today. She advised that the majority of students in South Kingstown play music because they choose to. She stated that if the Committee cuts the elementary music program, they will be taking away the sense of security and strength in school for many kids.
Julia DeMoranville, student, advised that music has always been a part of her life. She noted that she can still remember learning the 50 states to music in the third grade. She shared how she enjoyed singing at Christmas around town and how happy it made people in the community. She stated that it is a proven fact that music strengths the brain. It is important we keep the music program.
Sarah Dinklage, parent, acknowledged the difficult budget crisis. She stated that she feels very strongly that the Committee should do whatever it takes to maintain the academic, co-curricula, and student supports that make South Kingstown one of the highest ranked schools in the state. Mrs. Dinklage stated that if the High School orchestra survives, it will only be available to children whose parents can afford private lessons at the elementary level. She shared that her daughter made All-State this year, which would not have been possible had she not had the opportunity to learn at the elementary level.
A teacher of children noted that a change occurs when kids participate in music because they become connected. She stated that if elementary orchestra is eliminated, it will be doing a disservice to children.
A woman stated that not only is music important to students and parents in this town, she noted that we have two music stores that pay taxes that support the music program. She stated that cuts would be detrimental to business in this town as well as to education.
Emily Chen, 2003 South Kingstown graduate, shared that she had been in the strings programs since 4th grade. Since she was given the opportunity to play at the elementary, middle school, and high school level, she and a friend started a business, LaBella Music, where they pay at weddings, functions, etc. Ms. Chen stated that they would not have been able to do this if they were not given the opportunity to be in a music program.
1) Meeting Calendar:
Dr. Stringfellow reviewed the meeting calendar. She noted that the May 25, 2010 School Committee meeting agenda has been advertised.
a. School Committee Meeting – May 25, 2010, (5:30 PM Exec. Session) 7:00 PM, South Kingstown High School Cafeteria.
b. School Committee Wellness Subcommittee Meeting – May 27, 2010, 4:00 PM,
Administration Building.
c. School Committee Meeting – June 8, 2010, 7:00 PM, South Kingstown High School Cafeteria.
d. SELAC Meeting – June 9, 2010, 7:00 PM, Administration Building.
e. Senior Honors Night – June 10, 2010, 6:30 PM, South Kingstown High School.
f. Athletic Banquet – June 13, 2010, 5:00 PM, Quonset O Club.
g. Senior Prom – June 14, 2010, 7:00 PM, Officer’s Club-Newport.
h. Graduation – June 18, 2010, 6:00 PM, Ryan Center.
i. School Committee Meeting – June 22, 2010, 7:00 PM, South Kingstown High School Cafeteria.
j. School Committee Wellness Subcommittee – June 24, 2010, 4:00 PM, Administration Building.
k. School Committee Meeting – July 13, 2010, 7:00 PM, South Kingstown High School Cafeteria.
Dr. Stringfellow noted the various resolutions in the agenda packet that have come in
from different communities: Town of West Warwick Resolution supporting opposition to Senate Bill 2010; Town of West Warwick Resolution support for opposing Binding Arbitration; and Town of West Warwick Resolution supporting House Bill 7236. She noted that she received a couple more resolutions (from Bristol Warren and North Smithfield) which she can share with the committee if requested.
Dr. Stringfellow advised that she did advertise resolutions for the next meeting should the Committee wish to look at the resolutions and craft anything else that has not been submitted to our legislators. She advised that we have submitted resolutions on binding arbitration and their opinion on the funding formula. Dr. Stringfellow advised that there is a bill being proposed about a perpetual contract and she will bring back language from other communities if that is something members would like to bring forward.
Mr. Mueller stated that he is concerned about the Resolution with regard to 7236, which
asks for freeing from all unfunded mandates. He stated that he would oppose a bill like this without explicitly identifying what those mandates are because some mandates are about quality education to students. Mr. Mueller urged the School Committee to not act positively with regard to a blanket removal of unfunded mandates. He noted that we have moved suggestions to the General Assembly with regard to unfunded mandates and he does not think there has been a single positive reaction from the General Assembly. He would recommend the Committee identify specific mandates and to speak to our delegation in the General Assembly which ones we are looking at, rather than making a more generic statement as West Warwick has.
Mr. Angeli stated that he agrees and noted that there are probably many mandates we
would not consider, but this is a worthwhile exercise as we may need to consider other avenues as budgets get tighter.
Maureen Cotter stated that it seems that we are being very reactive to other districts and
she does not believe that is how we want to operate. She believes we have been out front with resolutions that are important to us as members of the South Kingstown School Committee and she would rather have a conversation driven from that, rather than being reactive to resolutions other districts have written.
Dr. Stringfellow asked if there was an expectation that she would provide a summary of
mandates at the May 25th meeting. Mr. Angeli expressed that he believes it would be more of a general comment about the issue. Ms. Cotter believes that the Committee should give more thought to our strategy before simply reacting.
3) Budget Reduction Matrix Completion:
Dr. Stringfellow presented a consolidated budget reduction matrix and provided a
budget update. She reviewed what has transpired the last four months, which included: a meeting in February with 5th grade teachers; two grade 5 Broad Rock Middle School forums; a meeting she and John Ritchotte had with a Wakefield community member to brainstorm health care savings, which resulted in a meeting with the Bristol-Warren and Exeter-West Greenwich superintendents and business directors to garner more information; two community forums with NESDEC; a March 19 meeting organized by Michelle Little with Wakefield parents; several PTO coffee hours; several administrators meetings; School Committee members have PTO meetings at elementary schools to answer questions; several meetings with the Commissioner, RIDE finance staff, legislators, and Town Council to discuss budget and funding formula scenarios.
Dr. Stringfellow noted that as an administrative group, they have responded to hundreds of emails and phone calls regarding grade 5 and the budget (55 just today). John Ritchotte sat with a Wakefield parent who is an expert in finance to review the budget; maps of redistricting scenarios were provided (some parents have purchased their own maps from the town at a low cost); at the request of the public they have provided documents, PowerPoints, DVDs of meetings, data, minutes from School Committee meetings from 2004 to present, they have offered to provide audio tapes of meetings prior to the time of capturing them on DVDs. She also advised that they have investigated various school consolidation scenarios at the request of the community.
Dr. Stringfellow stated that she would talk tonight about the budget reduction matrix.
She briefly reviewed our exposure with regard to revenue reduction, which is $458,000 to $460,000 worth of exposure with regard to pension reform and/or reduction in revenues if no reform is brought forth in the Governor’s 2010-2011 budget. Another piece is any exposure we may have with the funding formula: approximately $468,000 per year for eight years and small amounts for the next two years. Dr. Stringfellow noted other areas: a change in the charter school tuition to a per-pupil expenditure rate coupled with transportation ($122,000 worth of exposure); declining enrollment of 100 students from the projected enrollment to actual May 1st enrollment ($247,000 worth of exposure); school districts will now be required to pay tuition to the MET School and Davies (we currently have eight students at the MET - $107,000 worth of exposure). Dr. Stringfellow stated that in the worst case scenario, we are looking at $1.4 million loss if the funding formula is enacted and pension reform is not enacted in our favor. She advised that the goal tonight is to work through a budget reduction scenario of approximately $460,000 (our very real exposure) and to look at what areas in the matrix we can reduce.
Mr. Angeli stated that he would like to take elementary orchestra off the reduction list.
Mr. Jackson stated that he would like to remove middle school sports. Mr. Jackson recommended that the Committee look at what we are putting at the top of the list as opposed to the bottom of the list.
Mr. Mueller asked if the Superintendent can assure the Committee that the schools will remain operational even with the loss of item #12 (custodian reduction).
Mr. Angeli asked for clarification regarding the function of item #1, School Nurse Teacher. Dr. Stringfellow explained that it is a full-time floating school nurse teacher to cover the absence of nurse, accompany student on a field trip, etc.
Ms. Cotter asked the Superintendent what she feels least affects the education program of the students. Dr. Stringfellow stated that everything on this list affects the educational program for the students. She went on to explain that F&C Engagement, Contracted Therapy Services and ESY reduction would not result in a loss of services, but would be a transfer to another funding stream (Title I) and line item reductions. In addition, the further reduction of one Central Office Staff member would affect the operation of the Central Office but would not result in a direct loss of programs to students. These are areas that would protect our core from being eliminated.
Ms. Morris asked if we would have exposure by the state if the floating School Nurse Teacher position was eliminated. Mary Kelley advised that there are no state regulations that we would be struggling with. She further stated that it is a question of insuring that you have support for every child, every day, for every child who needs it. The floating SNT can fill in at an instant. Other districts have looked to model South Kingstown.
Mr. Mueller asked about “P” accounts reductions in the budget and what 10% of the “P” account amount to. Dr. Stringfellow advised that all of the schools are working with very limited supplies and cutting any further would render them in a difficult situation. Mr. Ritchotte advised that we have close to $800,000 in the “P” account. Mr. Mueller also asked about the Athletic Trainer. Dr. Stringfellow advised that the Athletic Trainer was cut in the $1.2 million cut. She advised that the last layer affects intramural middle school and high school sports. Mr. Mueller asked if they anticipated repair work that might be deferred for a year in the Maintenance Department. Mr. Ritchotte advised that the repair line is for those things that would break during the year.
Mr. Jackson asked how we are doing this fiscal year in the fund balance. Mr. Ritchotte advised that we have a balance of $967,000, noting that some comes from freezing the “P” accounts and some will be offset with the cuts we see in the supplemental budget. We are at risk for some reductions if pension reform does not take place.
Mr. Frostic stated that he would be disappointed if NEASK did not contribute to help the educational situation in the district. He further stated that he believes that #5 (reduction of the undesignated fund balance) makes sense. Regarding the educational components, he would put three last: elementary orchestra, middle school sports, and intramural sports; however, he would like to see if we could be creative with some booster club support groups. Regarding the School Nurse Teacher, he stated that he would like to see some creative arrangements with South County Hospital; and he would also like to reassess putting students with the most needs where they could get the support. Mr. Frostic also stated that he would like to look at realignment of the high school curriculum; and he would recommend a yearly audit of the teacher assistant positions to see if there are potential savings that will not degrade the quality of education.
Mr. Angeli advised that the Negotiations Subcommittee is made up of Liz Morris, Scott Mueller, and himself. He advised that they have had some active discussions with the bargaining unit going back to December. Mr. Angeli stated that it is a very difficult time for the district and for the teachers as well. We have a tremendously gifted group of educators that we work with collaboratively. We do have a contract that is terming next August. Through the conversation, we have had a specific request: ask the teachers to take a pay freeze for next year. We are not willing to offer much of anything in return. We could not promise now what we could not afford in the future. We do not have anything to update. We have not been able to come to an agreement with our bargaining unit.
4) 2010-2011 Budget: Addressed with Matrix Item above.
5) Broad Rock Middle School Re-Configuration (option to add grade 5):
Dr. Stringfellow advised that there will be four components to the BRMS presentation
this evening: 1) Mary Kelley will walk us through a pedagogical rationale for moving 5th graders to BRMS; 2) Sheila Sullivan will talk about her school, its offerings, Common Planning Time, and the successes of her 6th graders; 3) elementary principals will talk about transitions and celebrations offered to students and parents if a decision is made to move the 5th graders to BRMS; and 4) she will wrap up with her recommendations for consideration to address under School Committee Business.
Mary Kelley stated that empirical research on grade configuration has been sparse. In part this is the result of the need to review multiple variable of the educational structure students will experience, rather than just one element. Grade span is one of many aspects to be considered in an effective educational model. To help shed light on this decision, she approached the topic by looking through two lenses – first, by determining just what the dimensions of an effective school are and second, what the limited research tells us about grade configuration. Research on Effective Schools; (Lezotte, 2000; Dufour, 2004; Marzano, 2006).
Mary Kelley advised that there have been several studies on the core elements needed to have effective schools. The initial study goes back some 30 years and has been repeated many times since. The essential outcomes remain the same. Effective schools are professional learning communities that establish a clear and focused mission for high levels of student achievement. They establish an inclusive, collaborative process for improvement and shared leadership. Effective schools are professional learning communities that provide both students and staff with opportunities to learn. Effective schools frequently monitor student progress to determine areas of need and areas of strength. Effective schools maintain a safe and orderly environment. Effective schools maintain strong home – school relations. Ms. Kelley advised that to better understand the effective schools approach, she explained each component: The Professional Learning Community; Progress Monitoring; Safe and Orderly Environment; and Strong Home-School Relations.
Mary Kelley further explained grade configuration referring to research conducted by the Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory. She advised that this study cautions that the exigencies of geographic location, student populations, limited financial resources, and community preferences all impact the grade configurations within a school system, and those factors also explain why there is such a wide range of grade configurations across the country.
Ms. Kelly referred to Paglin and Fager; a study conducted for the American Educational Research Association; Furman and Luke; Hough; and her visit to schools in Connecticut that had moved to a 5-6 grade configuration.
Sheila Sullivan asked the community and members to envision a panoramic view of Broad Rock which is a community school, a place to thrive, and still maintains the joys of youth.
She advised that the school houses 308 6th grade students this year. She advised that the component that has remained consistent over the years is the dedication to excellence. Education is about the development of the whole child, creating a nurturing and supportive school community is the key to student success. In addition to core academics, students have unified arts classes (chorus, band, orchestra, general music, physical education, health, fitness, library, literacy, computer, art and art tech). Additionally, all students have a daily individualization block, which provides an opportunity for students for additional access to unified arts classes. She shared the School Improvement goals, PBIS, and Advisory. All students have an ILP (Individual Learning Plan), a document for goal-setting, action steps, and on-going self-assessment. At the end of the formal school day students can join clubs: drama, art club, student council, SKYRO, green club, math club, and Spanish club, intramurals, access to library media center. She invited parents to visit the BRMS website, visit a PTO meeting, join our list serve, or pick up our newsletter. We are thankful for all our community partners. We embrace the opportunity to welcome grade five students to BRMS.
Debra Zepp, Matunuck Principal, shared what could be expected if 5th grade students moved to BRMS. She advised that PLPs, IEPs, 504s, and RTI plans will be shared with Sheila Sullivan and the staff; the 4th grade teachers will complete articulation forms and submit them to the BRMS teachers. Students will have the opportunity to visit BRMS before the end of the year to help find the right bus and to find their way around the building. Ms. Zepp advised that moving up ceremonies will take place the last week of school for 4th and 5th graders. She noted that they have taken extra pictures of 4th grade students for the yearbook just in case the move takes place. Orientation meetings for parents will be available; and principals will plan the move of materials and furniture to BRMS to be ready to start.
Pauline Lisi, Peace Dale Principal, shared the benefits of moving 5th grade students to BRMS. She advised that they would have access to a modern facility for learning (labs, updated technology, athletics facilities); more opportunities for learning to occur with 5th grade teachers for teaming; students will be part of the school culture for two years, which will help them to develop ownership; an opportunity for students to make more friends; transition to CCMS and the high school will be easier; more human resources with educators and teacher assistances; a two grade bus system of same age peers; and the availability of a late bus for students to participate in after school activities.
Debra Zepp shared what would stay the same: the high priority for safety; access to a viable and challenging 5th grade curriculum; high expectation for student achievement; highly qualified teachers providing research-based instruction and progress monitored assessments; teachers and administrators sensitive to the social and emotional needs of children; cross grade articulation abut standards and expectations for 5th and 6th graders; PBIS; social time for students inside and outside of the classroom; parent participation; PTO; parent support; home-school relationships; and connection with the professional learning community.
Pauline Lisi shared the future plans for our 5th graders: more opportunities for grade 5 students to present and work with elementary students (green club, pen pals with the students, and to become ambassadors for incoming 5th grade students).
Dr. Stringfellow advised that last year Dr. Hicks recommended and the School Committee voted to reassemble Curtis Corner and Broad Rock in a cost savings reduction plan. As a result, all grade 6, 7, 8 teachers benefit from all grade common teacher and common planning. The children benefit from greater social experiences. In merging the middle schools equity was provided for all students grades 6 through 8. There now exists great collaboration, where there had been great competition between adolescents in our town. There were some teacher and learning aspects that were sacrificed in order to reorganize: lost science and social studies time, as well as unified arts time for grade 6 students; minimized district-wide efficiencies with Broad Rock being half-full; retained a bus transfer for all middle school students that could result in a potentially problematic situation; provide a single year transition for grade 6 students; provide a professional learning community where grade 6 teachers have no vertical colleagues to collaborate with.
NESDEC indicated that in moving grade 5 to BRMS you would free up much needed space at the elementary schools and would offer greater opportunity to grade 5 students. It would give students many opportunities as mentioned earlier (intramural, clubs, staff, etc). NESDEC mentioned that there could be a potential to save money with greater efficiencies in the future; however, this year efficiencies would be balanced with the addition of a half-time administrator and a potential transportation change. Dr. Stringfellow stated that there have been many conversations with parents via email and telephone calls regarding transportation options:
Option #1: keep the current transportation the same – two tier system with an elementary run and a middle school/high school run.
Option #2 (which the Superintendent recommends): two-tier system with an elementary run and a middle school/high school run; however, there would be middle school only buses and high school only buses. This would result in a $63,000 expenditure for one bus and the transfer would be eliminated. This option would be less of a disruption to the elementary and middle school start times as the elementary start times and end times would remain the same; the middle schools would start approximately two-three minutes later; and the high school would start approximately 15-17 minutes earlier.
Option #3: three-tier system with an elementary run, middle school run, and a high school run. This would result in a $63,000 cost for a bus and it would eliminate the middle school transfer. The elementary would start at 8:55 AM, middle schools would start at 7:55 AM, and the high school would start at 7:15 AM. This would result in a greater change in all start and end times.
Dr. Stringfellow encouraged the Committee to finish what they started and move grade 5 to Broad Rock Middle School and endorse option #2, which would eliminate the transfer for middle school students. She noted that regarding recess, Article 6, Section N in the collective bargaining agreement with the teachers, it reads that during the second semester the building principal will convene a recess committee to formulate a recommendation for the recess/lunch schedule for the following year; and she recommends that they follow the contract.
Committee members asked clarifying questions regarding transportation options, meeting students’ special needs, building space, and Common Planning Time.
6) Video Streaming:
Dr. Stringfellow advised that at the request of member Kevin Jackson, we were asked to
investigate video streaming, which happens at the Town meetings. She advised that currently, School Committee meetings are on DVD, recorded, aired on public access television show, and then available for folks to watch if they want to borrow the DVD. At the Town they conduct video streaming, in which, after the meeting is aired, it is put on their website so folks can watch it at their leisure. She advised that she asked John Ritchotte and John Bilotta to look at video streaming and to possibly utilize it for the school district.
Mr. Ritchotte advised that the Town began video streaming around the first of the year. He explained that it gives people who have access to a computer the ability to watch the meetings live, and it gives people a chance to go back and look at meetings 24/7 at their leisure. Mr. Ritchotte advised that they did look at the process the Town has used and invited the vendor to do a demonstration. He noted that they were pleased beyond their expectation for what they offered. He explained that they offer an opportunity to post our agenda via video streaming; access on the internet for the public; archive the meetings (unlimited) for an unlimited period of time; it would allow us to go live. Mr. Ritchotte advised that we would continue with the redundancy of filming our meetings and offering them on television at a later date. If we moved with video streaming, the cost would be $11,000 per year for the service. He advised that there would be a one-time set-up and training fee of about $2,000. Mr. Ritchotte advised that we will look at whether we could extend under the Town’s RFP; however, if not we would go out with our own RFP for the service. Mr. Bilotta and Mr. Ritchotte are recommending that we consider going with video streaming and start the service July 1, 2010. We would recommend paying for the service from our existing 2010 budget (contracted services line where we are running under budget); we would take the $15,000 from the 2010 budget and move forward.
Mr. Jackson advised that the Superintendent would do the paperwork and bring this item back as an agenda item.
MSV (1) move to suspend the rules, moving Comments from the Community to below
Item #IV on the agenda so that we can consider the action items that lie ahead of us; and then hear community comments as that comes up. Mueller, Angeli (6-0-0).
Mr. Jackson reviewed the Consent Agenda.
1) Approval of minutes meeting of: April 27, 2010
Executive Session Minutes of: April 27, 2010
2) Personnel Action(s)
3) Bid Award(s)
4) Exchange Student Request
5) Invoice(s) – School Attorney(s)
Dr. Stringfellow acknowledged the following retirements:
Carol Englander, Science Teacher at Curtis Corner Middle School, effective June 24,
2010. She has been worked in the district since October, 1975 and has worked with on our Dana Center and the SMILE Program. Ms. Englander has been a wonderful addition to our staff.
Domenic Quadrini, Math Teacher at South Kingstown High School, effective June 30,
2010. He has worked in the district since July, 2001 and has been a wonderfully, dynamic mathematics teacher.
Muriel Mueller, grades K/1 Teacher at Wakefield Elementary, effective at the end of the
2009-10 school year. She has worked in the district since September, 1977 and has been a wonderful early childhood educator.
Anna Burke, 7/8 Health Teacher at Curtis Corner Middle School, effective June 24,
2010. She has worked for the district since July, 1985 and everyone is aware of her contributions to the health curriculum in terms of domestic violence for teenagers. We will miss Mrs. Burke.
Arthur Faria, Jr., Science Teacher and partner of Mrs. Carol Englander at Curtis Corner
Middle School, effective June 24, 2010. He has been a wonderful science teacher in our middle level program since July, 1987.
Ms. Cotter advised that she will abstain from voting on the minutes of consent agenda as
she was absent at that meeting.
Mr. Frostic acknowledged Carol Englander’s work around the SMILE program, which has been a terrific program, particularly for a diverse set of people. He noted that it is an impressive, successful program, noting that every student went on to college.
MSV (2) move to approve the Consent Agenda. Frostic, Angeli (5-0-1; Cotter
abstained).
Mr. Jackson noted that Dr. Mega planned a trip to Africa 18 months ago and tried to be
present this evening; however, due to volcanic ash and British Airways strike, he could not attend.
1) Expenditure(s) over $10,000: Pulled from the Agenda.
2) Broad Rock Middle School Re-Configuration (option to add grade 5):
MS (3) move to approve the BRMS reconfiguration to move 5th graders up; and with the
Superintendent’s recommendation for busing option #2. Cotter, Angeli.
Maureen Cotter stated that she is comfortable making the motion; and believes that
the students will be well taken care of. She stated that she has confidence in the leadership of Sheila Sullivan to manage the transition. She also has complete confidence in the teachers who will be moving to Broad Rock Middle School. Ms. Cotter stated that she believes that the students will perform well and that you will not see any drop in student performance.
Mr. Mueller stated that that he believes that Dr. Stringfellow has done a wonderful job
of carrying forward the plan that Dr. Hicks generated years back. He also expressed appreciation to Mary Kelley for her work and literature presentation. Mr. Mueller stated that we have two very strong middle schools; they are amongst the best in the state. He stated that he believes the 5th graders will be well served however the schools are configured. He stated that he wanted to frame his position against the literature. Mr. Mueller stated that there is no evidence that students perform better in the middle school, or that they will do better if we leave them in the elementary school model. He noted that it is less an educational question but more of what kind of community we want to have. Frequently, communities that deteriorate over time look back at themselves years later asking how did this happen; and this is one of those times. Mr. Mueller stated that we will make a decision which has the potential of shaping what kind of community we will be over time. We will either organize ourselves around middle school education or elementary school education. Because of our personnel and the support that the Town of South Kingstown has provided to our public school that both options are good for kids. But in the end, we have a choice to make. There is always more of a challenge of engaging parents in the middle schools. Mr. Mueller stated that he would not support the motion.
Mr. Angeli stated that this has not been an easy topic to digest. He appreciated the
information delivered tonight. Mr. Angeli stated that the he keeps coming back to the fact that we are able to provide an environment where our professional staff can collaborate with one another. This move allows us to expand that significantly. Mr. Angeli stated that there will be consistency in the transition for 4th and 5th graders moving together to the middle school. He stated that we will be able to deliver a quality education, which students in the building expect from us. Mr. Angeli stated that no one at the table would agree to a structure that is not right for kids. He stated that what struck him was the opportunity to collaborate and expand experiences for children in a safe and welcoming environment. Mr. Angeli stated that he will support the move of 5th graders to Broad Rock.
Mr. Frostic stated that there is no compelling reason to move 5th graders to Broad Rock; however, it offers an opportunity to improve the quality of education and for teachers to plan together. Mr. Frostic stated that he would support the motion.
Ms. Morris stated that this is a gut-wrenching decision. She advised that she could not
support the move for this year. Ms. Morris noted that there are compelling reasons on both sides and people supporting each side. Ms. Morris stated that she goes back to her own experience and she would want to be able to walk into the same elementary school an additional year and look at it again next year.
Mr. Jackson stated that he would support the motion. He provided a backdrop in recalling the conversation last year when we moved the 6th graders to Broad Rock. Mr. Jackson stated that the message he heard from administrators is that this is a good idea. When he has doubts in his mind, administration is what he needs to think about, which is how he came around. Mr. Jackson stated that in the long run, he believes we can utilize a beautiful building, the children will do fine, and we need to do more work.
Community Comments
Susan Kimmerlein, parent, stated that this initiated as a space issue. She noted that NESDEC reports declining enrollment; and she questioned wouldn’t the need be met naturally as we lose enrollment. She presented a situation about space at the high school. Ms. Kimmerlein asked the Committee if we see ourselves as reactive or proactive; divisive or collaborative; static or innovative. She suggested that we hold off a year and that the School Committee assemble a task force for future planning and to consider PK-K at South Road; grades 1-6 at the four elementary locations; grades 7-8 at BRMS, grades 9-12 at High School; and a high school vocational/high school and recreational program at CCMS. She requested that the Committee hold off and think innovatively.
Keith Vorhaben, parent, asked about the $60,000 expense. Dr. Stringfellow explained the efficiencies gained with putting all the 5th graders together. Mr. Vorhaben suggested that the Committee hold off for a year only because there is so much that is going to change in the next couple of months. He stated that there may be a better plan out there and once you make the decision you cannot unmake it. Mr. Vorhaben stated that if this is budget neutral, then it is not urgent that we make the move this year. Mr. Vorhaben appealed the Committee to put it off one year.
Mr. Angeli stated that we began long-term planning with NESDEC. They continue to give us information and a guide on how we may want to lay out a long-range planning process. Mr. Angelis stated that we have the opportunity to engage the community to develop a plan going forward.
Sheri Shroka, West Kingston parent, stated that at the PTO meeting at West Kingston she began to realize a number of families share the same opinion regarding the change that may occur in the district. She submitted signatures of individuals that concur with her statement in support of the move. She presented the signatures to the Committee.
2) Broad Rock Middle School Re-Configuration (option to add grade 5)
(Continued):
Roland Benjamin, parent, suggested that the Committee table this vote until after the decision on school consolidation is made so that they can separate and clearly delineate that this is unrelated to the closing of an elementary school.
Ms. Bodziony, parent, stated that she has not heard about what the 5th grade experience
would be at Broad Rock, nor has there been an answer about recess. She asked for clarification about busing. Ms. Bodziony stated that in Ms. Kelley’s presentation, an optimal grade was not identified. Mrs. Bodziony expressed how grateful she was to live in a community comprised of such dedicated, intelligent, creative people who have been willing to search alternate solutions to the budget issues. She requested that the Committee table the move of 5th graders to Broad Rock, as well as all of the budget reduction scenarios until we have a clearer picture of what the actual funding formula will be. She also asked that the Committee consider creating a task force that would include the creative, intelligent community members to allow them to help you find creative solutions. Ms. Bodziony presented the Committee with a petition against the move (406 signatures opposed).
Carol Vetter spoke about the contractual obligations of moving 5th graders this year, as the contractual obligations are different 5th grade vs. 6th grades. She stated that the Committee is setting up is within the same building, a structure where you are treating equally talented employees differently. It is not a good environment, which will affect morale. Ms. Vetter stated that if we wait, then you can undo these contractual obligations. Ms. Vetter expressed concern about the change in start/end time for students. Dr. Stringfellow stated that we stand ready with partnership with the NEASK leadership to work through scenarios; and it would be our goal that every teacher feel welcomed.
Bob Trager, parent, stated that one of the biggest concerns was putting 5th graders on the
bus with high school students; however, it looks as if that has been taken care of. Mr. Trager stated that he was glad to see the Broad Rock building utilized. He supports the move.
Ella Whaley stated that she has the highest respect for the administrators and teachers.
Ms. Whaley stated that she has 8 or 9 points that link into the educational value of keeping 5th graders in the elementary school. She noted that she is an educator of 32 years in a middle school. Ms. Whaley expressed concern about the lack of discussion about academics tonight, stating that we did not get into a full dialogue about reading, writing, and mathematics; and how that would be delivered in the middle school vs. how it is delivered in the elementary school. As a middle school educator, she stated that she feels we can offer more educational value with 5th grade; and she does not compare the elementary model with the middle school model. She believes there would be gains with keeping kids in the elementary school.
Mrs. Whaley asked about the literacy and math coaches, asking if they will be involved with servicing students at the middle school. Dr. Stringfellow responded that the services follow the students. Mrs. Kelley noted that the coaches currently service 6th grade students.
Mrs. Whaley noted that all the elementary schools are high performing, and state testing shows that when they go to the middle school/high school we have less gains in state testing. Mary Kelley advised that the middle schools increased in achievement levels compared to the elementary.
Mrs. Whaley agreed that we have the utilization of a beautiful building; however, she is not willing to sacrifice some of the educational benefits that the students are receiving.
Regarding the articulation of teachers (5th grader to 5th grade teachers; 6th grader to 6th grade teachers), Mrs. Whaley noted that the horizontal articulation is important; however, the vertical articulation is just as important, if not more, in her eyes as an educator.
Mrs. Whaley referred to comments about expanding activities and the growth that can be made with the sports; but again, she is not hearing strong growth that can be made improving this model with the reading, math, and writing.
Mrs. Whaley stated that guidance counselors were also mentioned; and she asked if we have enough staff so that guidance can also represent our 5th graders. If not, would this be additional staff; and would this move actually cost the district money.
Mrs. Whaley asked how many splits would be eliminated with this move.
Dr. Stringfellow responded that she did not have that information tonight. She noted that efficiencies are gained; and some splits will be eliminated.
Mrs. Whaley stated that she takes many phone calls across the district, noting that she has
been an educator for a long time and has been an advocate for kids. She advised that most of the concerns, which she passes on to Committee members and administration, are at the middle school and high level (Special Education and 504). She noted that very few are from elementary school parents.
Mrs. Whaley stated that progress monitoring has always been a concern. She noted that she heard Aims Web mentioned; however, she did not hear the NWEA that happens at the middle school. Mary Kelley advised that the NWEA would remain at the 6th grade; and that Aims Web would remain at the 5th grade. Mrs. Whaley asked how often we do the progress monitoring with the Aims Web at the elementary level. Mary Kelley responded that it would depend on the needs of the student. She added that progress monitoring would be more frequent with a student on RTI. Mrs. Whaley stated that neighboring towns with the NWEA do the net progress monitoring three times a year and she believes we do it here at the beginning of the year and at the end of the year. Mrs. Whaley asked if that would continue or if we would do three progress monitoring. Ms. Kelley advised that this was our first year at the middle level; and it is a major process getting this up and running. Ms. Kelley stated that we begin with twice a year; and as we have it more solidly in place, we move to three times a year. Mrs. Whaley noted that she is in a district that utilizing it, she piloted the progress three times a year and really focused in on root scores and goal strands and had 100% raised scores in the NWEA which ties in with the NECAP. She stated that she believes that it is a direction we are heading.
Mrs. Whaley stated that mention was made about Common Planning Time, which we have in both. The family support is more difficult to keep in the middle school. She noted that it was mentioned about cohorts staying together; and she believes that it is better for 5th graders to stay in the elementary school. She noted that the long-range planning is key.
Mrs. Whaley stated that she hopes that one of the Committee members will change their mind after hearing the educational values she listed; noting that a 3-3 vote would mean the motion fails.
Eileen Daly-Labelle, parent, stated that due to the late date for this decision, her concern
is for the special education population, which is very vulnerable. She noted that the transition time is very short and it would not be beneficial for challenged children. Ms. Daly-Labelle encouraged the Committee to not vote this evening.
Karen McCurdy, middle school parent, spoke about research and the educational value. She advised that the research shows that the shorter time a child is in school, the less time the students are connected to adults and the worse they do. Ms. McCurdy stated that now the discussion is about moving to a K-4 school, yet across the country, districts are going to a K-8 model. She urged the Committee to reconsider their vote and to look into the research before making a move.
Chris Roman, parent and URI professor, asked the Committee to table the vote. He stated
that the educational model goes back to whether we see ourselves as an elementary district, middle school district, or high school district. As a URI professor, he has observed that the younger a student has their head screwed on straight, the better they will do in the future.
Mr. Roman stated that we need to think about a 5-10 year plan. He noted that the budget issues will never relent; and that busing will never be covered by the state or the funding formula.
Mr. Roman spoke about contract obligations, asking that the job fair be put off to buy us time.
Dr. Stringfellow advised that the elementary principals noted that the time for this decision will impact yearbook, moving up ceremonies, opportunities for students to look at BRMS. She also noted that putting the job fair off would implicate unemployment we would have to pay.
Jennifer Havens, parent, asked that the Committee put the decision off another year to allow for more time to prepare 4th graders and to allow them to have one last year in the elementary school. Kids are resilient, but they do not understand. Ms. Havens stated that the trust is breaking down and putting off the decision will build the trust with the community.
Raissa Mosher, parent, stated that she was encouraged when Mr. Frostic spoke about long-range planning. She stated that she is confused that this move does not allow us to make long-range planning.
Suzanne Keating, parents, stated that she does not trust the Committee. She asked that
the Committee wait a five days, make a decision about the budget, and then come back to this issue. She questioned why the Committee why they are not waiting before making budget decisions. Mr. Angeli stated that the Committee has been talking about this since February. He noted that the Committee did not link closing Wakefield with moving the 5th graders to BRMS; the community did that. Mr. Angeli stated that as the parent of a 4th grader, he believes that the Committee has waited too long to make this decision, as he wants to know as a parent.
Jane Bouchard stated that she has always believed that you assume positive intentions. She advised that her impression is that each Committee member was elected by the people in the room and entrusted with our money and children. Ms. Bouchard stated that she has had faith that the Committee would carry out the duties they were elected to do. She stated that she has heard people asking the Committee to consider bundling decisions together because it makes sense to do it that way. Ms. Bouchard asked that the Committee treat the community the same way the community has treated the Committee.
Donny Waterous, Peace Dale teacher, stated that educationally he sees little to no change (5th graders will not use the science labs). He advised that you will lose continuity in moving kids out of the elementary school. Mr. Waterous stated that we need to hold on to the educational piece of the elementary school as it is not broken. Regarding logistics, Mr. Waterous stated that he does not see this as budget neutral (no savings in splits, intramural costs more, buses cost more, moving costs more). He also stated that the morale of the teachers will be a factor. Mr. Waterous stated that it is obvious that the community does not want this.
Mr. Mutschler, parent, stated that if this is such a great educational idea, give the children a year to prepare for the change.
Jonathan Daly-Labelle, parent, asked if the Committee thought that Mrs. Kimmerlein’s plan was viable. Mr. Daly-Labelle stated that this is about supporting the entire school system and having community and School Committee partnerships. You have really engaged and see the breadth and depth of the passion and intelligence that it out there in the community. You can lock in with the people to help make this school system the best school system we can have.
Mike Chappell asked about the three busing tiers. Mr. Ritchotte explained the various options. Mr. Chappell shared concern about busing for his 4th grade child. He also stated that he does not think making the move right now is best psychologically for some students.
Leslie Pierini, Wakefield parent, stated that making a decision now for September is like dropping a bomb on the kids, noting that 4th graders are not prepared for this.
Don Brown stated that he does not see the educational benefits or any difference with
having 5th graders at elementary or BRMS. He questioned if it is worth the disruption. He stated that he does not think the benefits outweigh the disruption to the community as a whole.
Mr. Frostic stated that originally he said there was no compelling reasons to make the
change now, but he believed there were good reasons. Mr. Frostic stated that he noted that it is probably a better move for the school system in the long run. He is compelled about the discussion that we do not have to make the decision now. Therefore, he advised that he will change his vote.
Mr. Jackson stated that the Committee could not vote on this at the May 25th meeting
because it is not an agenda item. Discussion followed about the provision for an emergency posting that could not be anticipated and about the Open Meetings law. Ms. Cotter read the Open Meetings Act regarding posting School Committee agendas. Dr. Stringfellow noted that she could launch the all-call so everyone could get notice that this item would be on the next agenda.
Ms. Cotter thanked the community for their feedback. She responded to some of the observations on whether this was a precursor move to closing Wakefield Elementary …. absolutely not. That noted that this is different and it is not related. Ms. Cotter stated that this is not part of her thinking process. She expressed appreciation for the community engagement this particular budget season.
Mr. Frostic stated that when he looks at the evidence and what is presented, he believes that it is probably a better move to move 5th graders to BRMS for stability over the long-term for students. Do you have to do it this year or can we do it as part of a long-term planning is the one thing that sways him. We should spend about six months working with the community and NESDEC as foundation and focus groups to figure out a real long-range plan for the school district.
Mr. Angeli stated that he believes that this is the right move to make. He advised that the
Committee has listened to just about every piece of public commentary, every email, phone call.
Mr. Angeli stated that he thinks the Committee is passing on an opportunity to lead; and we need to make decisions. Mr. Angeli stated that he appreciates everyone’s difference of opinion; however, the Committee needs to start acting on some of these things, as community members need to have answers.
Mr. Jackson stated that he still goes back to the professional educators. He stated that he
thinks the Committee needs to have a vote as they have to do their work. Mr. Jackson commented that sometimes long-range planning gets jammed up.
MSV (3) move that this be brought off the table for reconsideration at the meeting
scheduled for May 25, 2010. Mueller, Morris (3-3-0; Jackson, Cotter, and Angeli, nay)
Discussion followed about voting process and procedure.
MSV (4) move to table to May 25, 2010. Angeli, Jackson (5-1-0; Cotter, nay)
Dr. Stringfellow advised that she will utilize the emergency clause of the Open Meetings Act in order to advertise it, she will post it in two public buildings, she will contact the Attorney General’s Office and will consult with legal counsel in the morning, and she will send notice out on Connect Ed.
Mr. Angeli stated that he would like some guidance from the Chair and Superintendent that we establish some firm guidelines with respect to testimony at the May 25, 2010 meeting. He noted that it is essential that the Committee get some work done. Discussion followed.
Ms. Cotter recommended that the bylaws be reviewed as it addresses community comments (up to 30 minutes).
2) Budget Reduction Matrix Completion: Not Addressed
3) 2010-2011 Budget: Not Addressed
MSV (5) move to seal the minutes of the executive session and adjourn at 12:10 AM. Mueller, Morris (6-0-0).
Respectfully submitted,
Kristen E. Stringfellow, Clerk
South Kingstown School Committee
KES:djf